Dysbetalipoproteinemia: Differentiating Multifactorial Remnant Cholesterol Disease From Genetic ApoE Deficiency.

CONTEXT: Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is characterized by the accumulation of remnant lipoprotein particles and associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). DBL is thought to be mainly caused by the presence of an E2/E2 genotype of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene, in addition to environmental factors. However, there exists considerable phenotypic variability among DBL patients. OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to verify the proportion of DBL subjects, diagnosed using the gold standard Fredrickson criteria, who did not carry E2/E2 and to compare the clinical characteristics of DBL patients with and without E2/E2. METHODS: A total of 12 432 patients with lipoprotein ultracentrifugation as well as APOE genotype or apoE phenotype data were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Among the 12 432 patients, 4% (n = 524) were positive for Fredrickson criteria (F+), and only 38% (n = 197) of the F+ individuals were E2/E2. The F+ E2/E2 group had significantly higher remnant cholesterol concentration (3.44 vs 1.89 mmol/L) and had higher frequency of DBL-related xanthomas (24% vs 2%) and floating beta (95% vs 11%) than the F+ non-E2/E2 group (P < 0.0001). The F+ E2/E2 group had an independent higher risk of PVD (OR 11.12 [95% CI 1.87-66.05]; P = 0.008) events compared with the F+ non-E2/E2 group. CONCLUSION: In the largest cohort of DBL worldwide, we demonstrated that the presence of E2/E2 was associated with a more severe DBL phenotype. We suggest that 2 DBL phenotypes should be distinguished: the multifactorial remnant cholesterol disease and the genetic apoE deficiency disease.

Validating the NIH LDL-C equation in a specialized lipid cohort: Does it add up?

BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations for the management of lipids in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease is largely based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration. LDL-C is commonly calculated by the Friedewald equation, which has many limitations. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) equation better estimates LDL-C, particularly in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and/or low LDL-C. We validated the NIH LDL-C equation at the first Canadian clinical laboratory to implement this equation. METHODS: A total of 3161 lipid ultracentrifugation results from a specialized lipid cohort of 2836 patients were included. LDL-C was calculated using the NIH and Friedewald equations and compared to LDL-C measured by ultracentrifugation. We determined the accuracy of these equations at treatment thresholds and developed NIH equation restriction criteria to ensure only accurate results are reported. RESULTS: Ultracentrifugation LDL-C more strongly correlated with NIH-calculated LDL-C (r2 = 0.889) than Friedewald-calculated LDL-C (r2 = 0.807) and resulted in fewer non-sensical negative LDL-C values. The correlation for NIH-calculated LDL-C improved to r2 = 0.975 after applying our restriction criteria. The NIH equation showed equivalent or superior concordance with ultracentrifugation at treatment thresholds. The LDL-C mean absolute difference increased with increasing TG and decreasing LDL-C concentrations, although the NIH equation was more robust under both conditions. CONCLUSIONS: We validated the NIH equation against ultracentrifugation in a cohort with a wide lipid concentration range, which supported its superiority over the Friedewald equation. We recommend clinical implementing the NIH equation for all patients except those with type III hyperlipoproteinemia or TG > 9.04 mmol/L, with an LDL-C lower reporting limit of <0.50 mmol/L.

A simplified diagnosis algorithm for dysbetalipoproteinemia.

BACKGROUND: Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is a disease of remnant lipoprotein accumulation caused by a defective apolipoprotein (apo) E and is associated with a considerable atherogenic burden. However, there exists confusion concerning the diagnosis of this disorder, and as a consequence, misdiagnosis is frequent. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to propose an algorithm for the diagnosis of DBL using simple clinical variables. METHODS: In a large cohort of 12,434 dyslipidemic patients, 4891 patients presented with mixed dyslipidemia (total cholesterol ≥ 5.2 mmol/L [200 mg/dL] and triglycerides ≥ 2.0 mmol/L [175 mg/dL]), and 188 DBL patients were identified based on the presence of an elevated very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/triglyceride ratio and were carriers of apoE2/E2. The APOE genotype or phenotype as well as the lipoprotein ultracentrifugation results were available for all patients. RESULTS: Among the laboratory variables associated with the lipid profile, the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)/apoB ratio was the best predictor of DBL diagnosis based on the C-statistic. Previous proposed criteria had either low sensitivity or low specificity for the diagnosis of DBL. Using a non-HDL-C/apoB cut point of 3.69 mmol/g (1.43 in conventional units) followed by the presence of apoE2/E2 resulted in a good sensitivity (94.8%), negative predictive value (99.8%), specificity (99.6%), positive predictive value (88.5%), accuracy (99.4%), and area under the curve (0.97 [0.95-0.99]) for the prediction of DBL. CONCLUSION: We therefore propose a 3-step algorithm for the diagnosis of DBL using total cholesterol and triglycerides as a first step, the non-HDL-C/apoB ratio as a second screening criterion and finally the APOE genotype, lipoprotein ultracentrifugation, or electrophoresis as a confirmatory test.

Triglycerides, hypertension, and smoking predict cardiovascular disease in dysbetalipoproteinemia.

BACKGROUND: Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is an autosomal recessive lipid disorder associated with a reduced clearance of remnant lipoproteins and is associated with an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The genetic cause of DBL is apoE2 homozygosity in 90% of cases. However, a second metabolic hit must be present to precipitate the disease. However, no study has investigated the predictors of CVD, peripheral artery disease and coronary artery disease in a large cohort of patients with DBL. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical characteristics of a DBL cohort and to identify the predictors of CVD, peripheral artery disease, and coronary artery disease in this population. METHODS: The inclusion criteria included age ≥ 18 years, apoE2/E2, triglycerides (TG) > 135 mg/dL and VLDL-C/plasma TG ratio > 0.30. RESULTS: We studied 221 adult DBL patients, of which 51 (23%) had a history of CVD. We identified 3 independent predictors of CVD, namely hypertension (OR 5.68, 95% CI 2.13-15.16, P = .001), pack year of smoking (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = .01) and TG tertile (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.09-3.05, P = .02). The CVD prevalence was 51% in patients with hypertension and 18% in those without hypertension (P = .00001), and 30% in the highest TG tertile vs 15% in the lowest tertile (P = .04). Similarly, the CVD prevalence was higher in heavy smokers compared with nonsmokers (36% vs 13%, P = .006). CONCLUSION: Hypertension, smoking, and TG are independently associated with CVD risk in patients with DBL. Aggressive treatment should be initiated in patients with DBL because of the increased risk of CVD.

Atypical familial dysbetalipoproteinemia associated with high polygenic cholesterol and triglyceride scores treated with ezetimibe and evolocumab.

We present a 37-year-old man diagnosed with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia who presented with the severe hyperlipidemic phenotype. None of the usual metabolic triggers were found to explain his severe lipid abnormalities. Genetic analysis revealed the expected APOE E2/E2 genotype, but no other mutations were found to explain any monogenic dyslipidemia or syndrome. Polygenic risk scores for quantitative lipid traits did reveal scores placing the patient in the >99th percentile for the general population concerning polygenic susceptibility for both high cholesterol and triglycerides. Owing to his gastrointestinal intolerance to two high-intensity statins, he was treated with both ezetimibe 10 mg a day and evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks. All measures of potentially atherogenic lipids were markedly improved and remained so for more than 10 months of follow-up. This case report shows an unusual trigger for severe hyperlipidemia with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia and a favorable therapeutic response to the combination of ezetimibe and evolocumab.

ApoB in clinical care: Pro and Con.

Whether apoB adds significantly to the assessment of the risk and therapy of the atherogenic dyslipoproteinemias has been vigorously contested over many years. That trapping of apoB lipoprotein particles within the arterial wall is fundamental to the initiation and maturation of atherosclerotic lesions within the arterial wall is now widely accepted. At the same time, the concept that primary prevention should be based on the risk of a cardiovascular event, a measure that integrates the effects of age, sex, blood pressure, lipids and other factors, has also become widely accepted. Within the risk framework, the issue becomes whether apoB adds significantly to the assessment of risk. On the other hand, it can be argued that the risk model undervalues how important a role that LDL and blood pressure play as causes of atherosclerosis and that when considered as causes, the importance of apoB emerges. These are the two sides of the debate that will be presented in the article that follows: one will highlight the pros of measuring apoB, the second the cons. The reader can make up his or her mind which side of the issue they favour.

The spectrum of type III hyperlipoproteinemia.

BACKGROUND: Type III hyperlipoproteinemia is a highly atherogenic dyslipoproteinemia characterized by hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia due to markedly increased numbers of cholesterol-enriched chylomicron and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnant lipoprotein particles. Type III can be distinguished from mixed hyperlipidemia based on a simple diagnostic algorithm, which involves total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B (apoB). However, apoB is not measured routinely. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to determine if patients with type III could be distinguished from mixed hyperlipidemia based on lipoprotein lipids. METHODS: Classification was based first on total cholesterol and triglyceride and then on the apoB diagnostic algorithm using apoB plus total cholesterol plus triglycerides, and validated by sequential ultracentrifugation. Four hundred and forty normals, 637 patients with hypertriglyceridemia, and 714 with hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia were studied. Plasma lipoproteins were separated by sequential ultracentrifugation and heparin-manganese precipitation. Cholesterol, triglyceride, and apoB were measured in plasma and isolated lipoprotein fractions. RESULTS: Of the 1351 patients with hypertriglyceridemia, 49 had type III hyperlipoproteinemia, as diagnosed by the apoB algorithm and validated by ultracentrifugation. Plasma triglycerides were higher in the type III subjects: 4.16 mmol/L (3.35-6.08, 25th-75th percentile), but there was considerable overlap with the hypertriglyceridemic subjects 2.65 mmol/L (1.91-4.20, 25th-75th percentile) and the combined hyperlipidemic subjects 3.02 mmol/L (2.07-5.32, 25th-75th percentile). Similarly, total cholesterol was 4.79 mmol/L (4.31-5.58, 25th-75th percentile) for type III vs 5.5 mmol/L (4.64-5.78, 25th-75th percentile) and 7.02 mmol/L (6.39-7.96, 25th-75th percentile), respectively. By contrast, as identified by the apoB algorithm, the VLDL-C/TG, VLDL-C/VLDL-TG, VLDL-C/VLDL apoB, and VLDL apoB/LDL apoB ratios were all higher in type III than in the other hypertriglyceridemic dyslipoproteinemias with the exception of type V as diagnosed by the apoB algorithm. CONCLUSION: Cholesterol and triglycerides cannot reliably distinguish type III hyperlipoproteinemia from mixed hyperlipidemia. Adding apoB and applying the apoB algorithm makes reliable diagnosis possible and easy. However, unless apoB is introduced into routine clinical care, type III hyperlipoproteinemia will often not be recognized. Given the cardiovascular risk associated with type III and its responsiveness to treatment, this should not be acceptable.

Case of familial hyperlipoproteinemia type III hypertriglyceridemia induced acute pancreatitis: Role for outpatient apheresis maintenance therapy.

Hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis (HTGP) accounts for up to 10% of acute pancreatitis presentations in non-pregnant individuals and is the third most common cause of acute pancreatitis after alcohol and gallstones. There are a number of retrospective studies and case reports that have suggested a role for apheresis and insulin infusion in the acute inpatient setting. We report a case of HTGP in a male with hyperlipoproteinemia type III who was treated successfully with insulin and apheresis on the initial inpatient presentation followed by bi-monthly outpatient maintenance apheresis sessions for the prevention of recurrent HTGP. We also reviewed the literature for the different inpatient and outpatient management modalities of HTGP. Given that there are no guidelines or randomized clinical trials that evaluate the outpatient management of HTGP, this case report may provide insight into a possible role for outpatient apheresis maintenance therapy.

Effect of adding bezafibrate to standard lipid-lowering therapy on post-fat load lipid levels in patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia. A randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is a genetic disorder associated with impaired postprandial lipid clearance. The effect of adding bezafibrate to standard lipid-lowering therapy on postprandial and fasting lipid levels in patients with FD is unknown. In this randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial, 15 patients with FD received bezafibrate and placebo for 6 weeks in randomized order in addition to standard lipid-lowering therapy (statin, ezetimibe, and/or lifestyle). We assessed post-fat load lipids, expressed as incremental area under the curve (iAUC) and area under the curve (AUC), as well as fasting levels and safety, and found that adding bezafibrate did not reduce post-fat load non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) iAUC (1.78 ± 4.49 mmol·h/l vs. 1.03 ± 2.13 mmol·h/l, P = 0.57), but did reduce post-fat load triglyceride (TG) iAUC (8.05 ± 3.32 mmol·h/l vs. 10.61 ± 5.92 mmol·h/l, P = 0.03) and apoB (0.64 ± 0.62 g·h/l vs. 0.93 ± 0.71 g·h/l, P = 0.01). Furthermore, bezafibrate significantly improved AUC and fasting levels of non-HDL-C, TG, total cholesterol, HDL-C, and apoB. Bezafibrate was associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (78.4 ± 11.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 86.1 ± 5.85 ml/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.002). In conclusion, in patients with FD, the addition of bezafibrate to standard lipid-lowering therapy resulted in improved post-fat load and fasting plasma lipids. Combination therapy of statin/fibrate could be considered as standard lipid-lowering treatment in FD.

Remnant Cholesterol Elicits Arterial Wall Inflammation and a Multilevel Cellular Immune Response in Humans.

OBJECTIVE: Mendelian randomization studies revealed a causal role for remnant cholesterol in cardiovascular disease. Remnant particles accumulate in the arterial wall, potentially propagating local and systemic inflammation. We evaluated the impact of remnant cholesterol on arterial wall inflammation, circulating monocytes, and bone marrow in patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD). APPROACH AND RESULTS: Arterial wall inflammation and bone marrow activity were measured using 18F-FDG PET/CT. Monocyte phenotype was assessed with flow cytometry. The correlation between remnant levels and hematopoietic activity was validated in the CGPS (Copenhagen General Population Study). We found a 1.2-fold increase of 18F-FDG uptake in the arterial wall in patients with FD (n=17, age 60±8 years, remnant cholesterol: 3.26 [2.07-5.71]) compared with controls (n=17, age 61±8 years, remnant cholesterol 0.29 [0.27-0.40]; P<0.001). Monocytes from patients with FD showed increased lipid accumulation (lipid-positive monocytes: Patients with FD 92% [86-95], controls 76% [66-81], P=0.001, with an increase in lipid droplets per monocyte), and a higher expression of surface integrins (CD11b, CD11c, and CD18). Patients with FD also exhibited monocytosis and leukocytosis, accompanied by a 1.2-fold increase of 18F-FDG uptake in bone marrow. In addition, we found a strong correlation between remnant levels and leukocyte counts in the CGPS (n=103 953, P for trend 5×10-276). In vitro experiments substantiated that remnant cholesterol accumulates in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells coinciding with myeloid skewing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FD have increased arterial wall and cellular inflammation. These findings imply an important inflammatory component to the atherogenicity of remnant cholesterol, contributing to the increased cardiovascular disease risk in patients with FD.

Vascular risk factors, vascular disease, lipids and lipid targets in patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia: a European cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD), also known as type III hyperlipoproteinemia, is a genetic dyslipidemia characterized by elevated very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and chylomicron remnant particles that confers increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of vascular risk factors, CVD, lipid values, treatment and lipid targets in patients with FD across Europe. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed in 305 patients with FD from seven academic hospitals in four European countries. Information was collected from clinical records. RESULTS: Patients mean (±standard deviation) age was 60.9±14.4 years, 201 (66%) were male, 69 (23%) had diabetes mellitus (DM) and 87 (29%) had a prior history of CVD. Mean body mass index was 28.5±5.0 kg/m2. Lipid-lowering medication was used by 227 (74%) patients (27% usual dose (theoretical low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction≤40%) and 46% intensive dose (theoretical LDL-C reduction>40%)). Non high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels below treatment target (<3.3 mmol/L) were present in 123 (40%) patients and 163 patients (53%) had LDL-C levels below target (<2.5 mmol/L). No significant determinants were found for having non-HDL-C levels below target, while a prior history of CVD (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.05-3.47) and presence of DM (OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.08-3.70) were associated with having LDL-C levels below treatment target. CONCLUSION: The majority of FD patients had non-HDL-C levels above the treatment target of 3.3 mmol/L. Intensive dose lipid-lowering medication was used by only half of the patients, leaving them at increased cardiovascular risk.

Molecular mechanisms responsible for the differential effects of apoE3 and apoE4 on plasma lipoprotein-cholesterol levels.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to understand the molecular basis of how the amino acid substitution C112R that distinguishes human apolipoprotein (apo) E4 from apoE3 causes the more proatherogenic plasma lipoprotein-cholesterol distribution that is known to be associated with the expression of apoE4. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Adeno-associated viruses, serotype 8 (AAV8), were used to express different levels of human apoE3, apoE4, and several C-terminal truncation and internal deletion variants in C57BL/6 apoE-null mice, which exhibit marked dysbetalipoproteinemia. Plasma obtained from these mice 2 weeks after the AAV8 treatment was analyzed for cholesterol and triglyceride levels, as well as for the distribution of cholesterol between the lipoprotein fractions. Hepatic expression of apoE3 and apoE4 induced similar dose-dependent decreases in plasma cholesterol and triglyceride to the levels seen in control C57BL/6 mice. Importantly, at the same reduction in plasma total cholesterol, expression of apoE4 gave rise to higher very low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C) and lower high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels relative to the apoE3 situation. The C-terminal domain and residues 261 to 272 in particular play a critical role, because deleting them markedly affected the performance of both isoforms. CONCLUSIONS: ApoE4 possesses enhanced lipid and VLDL-binding ability relative to apoE3, which gives rise to impaired lipolytic processing of VLDL in apoE4-expressing mice. These effects reduce VLDL remnant clearance from the plasma compartment and decrease the amount of VLDL surface components available for incorporation into the high-density lipoprotein pool, accounting for the more proatherogenic lipoprotein profile (higher VLDL-C/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio) occurring in apoE4-expressing animals compared with their apoE3 counterparts.

A multicenter study on the precision and accuracy of homogeneous assays for LDL-cholesterol: comparison with a beta-quantification method using fresh serum obtained from non-diseased and diseased subjects.

BACKGROUND: Homogeneous assays for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) have good precision and are pretreatment-free procedures. However, their accuracies have been questioned, especially in diseased subjects. In this study, we aimed to verify whether LDL-C levels determined by homogeneous assays [LDL-C (H)] agree with those determined by a beta-quantification method [LDL-C (BQ)] in fresh clinical samples. METHODS: We determined LDL-C levels in 49 non-diseased and 124 diseased subjects whose triglyceride (TG) levels were less than 11.29 mmol/L (1000 mg/dL) using 12 homogeneous assays and a BQ method simultaneously. RESULTS: In total, 30.6% of non-diseased subjects and 46.0% of diseased subjects were in the postprandial state. The maximum inter- and intra-assay CVs were 1.8% and 1.5%, and 8 reagents had a CV of 1.0% or less. The mean bias ranged from -0.5% to 1.8% for non-diseased subjects and from -0.7% to 1.6% for diseased subjects. For non-diseased subjects, all but one reagent achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) total error requirement in more than 90% of samples. However, for diseased subjects, the number of reagents that met this requirement was low. With some reagents, LDL-C (H) was higher than LDL-C (BQ), especially in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. While for other reagents, the difference between the two methods was not associated with hypertriglyceridemia except for type I (n = 2) and type III hyperlipidemia (n = 1). Postprandial sampling was not the main factor for discordant results. CONCLUSIONS: LDL-C (H) agrees with LDL-C (BQ) in non-diseased subjects, but exhibits positive bias for subjects with hypertriglyceridemia in diseased subjects for some reagents.

Hepatic lipase activity is decreased in Japanese patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia.

BACKGROUND: Type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP), a disorder associated with a high incidence of premature cardiovascular diseases, is characterized by the accumulation of remnant lipoproteins in the plasma. The primary genetic defect in patients with type III HLP is the presence of apolipoprotein E2 (apoE2), an isoform of apoE, and accumulation of remnant lipoproteins in the plasma has been thought to be attributable to the presence of apoE2, which bind poorly to low density lipoprotein receptors, resulting in defective remnant lipoprotein clearance. On the other hand, the activity of hepatic lipase (HL), the enzyme that plays a pivotal role in the removal of remnant lipoproteins, in type III HLP has not been investigated. METHODS: We examined post-heparin plasma lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and HL activities in 7 patients with type III HLP. The activities of HL and LPL in post-heparin plasma were measured separately by an immunochemical method using antiserum specifically directed against HL. RESULTS: The post-heparin plasma HL activity was significantly reduced, while the LPL activity was normal. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced HL activity may account, at least in part, for the accumulation of remnant lipoproteins in the plasma, a characteristic feature of type III HLP.

Correlation of atherosclerosis between different topographic sites is highly dependent on the type of hyperlipidemia.

There is a surprising paucity of studies that provide quantitative correlative data on the extent of atherosclerosis between different topographic sites. The impact of cardiovascular risk factors is dependent on the vascular bed, which underlies site-selective effects on progression of atherosclerosis. Therefore, the intraindividual correlation of atherosclerosis between different topographic sites may be dependent on the specific cardiovascular risk profile. The focused objective of the current study is to evaluate whether the correlation of the extent of atherosclerosis between different topographic sites is dependent on the type of hyperlipidemia. Atherosclerosis was quantified at four different topographic locations in the aorta of rabbits with type II or type III hyperlipidemia. Correlation coefficients and semi-partial correlation coefficients adjusted for plasma lipoproteins and sex were determined to compare the degree of atherosclerosis at different topographic sites. Semi-partial correlations adjusted for total plasma cholesterol, plasma triglycerides, and sex of the intima/media ratio between different topographic sites were highly dependent on the type of hyperlipidemia. E.g., the semi-partial correlation coefficient between the intima/media ratio at the level of the ascending aorta and at the level of the descending thoracic aorta was 0.87 (p < 0.0001) in the model of type II hyperlipidemia and was only 0.10 (p = NS) in the model of type III hyperlipidemia. This divergent pattern was also observed for other intersite correlations. Semi-partial Pearson correlation coefficients were very similar to unadjusted Pearson correlation coefficients. Correlation of atherosclerosis between different topographic sites may vary importantly in relation to the type of hyperlipidemia.

[Hypertricglyceridemia: prognostic impact and treatment options]. / Hypertriglyceridämie: prognostische Bedeutung und Therapiemöglichkeiten.

Elevated Triglyceride levels are associated with increased risk for atherosclerotic disease and additional vascular risk factors such as obesity, hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance. To estimate the individual cardiovascular risk of a patient with elevated triglycerides LDL- and HDL-cholesterol levels, concomitant diseases, composition of triglyceride rich lipoproteins and a family history for premature coronary heart disease are important. Primary goals for the management of hypertriglyceridemia are a reduction of cardiovascular risk and prevention of triglyceride associated complications such as the chylomicronemia syndrome. The basis of treatment are lifestyle changes: dietary intervention, alcohol avoidance, regular physical activity, weight loss and smoking cessation to modify risk factors. If triglyceride levels can not be sufficiently reduced by lifestyle intervention pharmacotherapy (nicotinic acid, fibrates and omega-3-acid ethyl esters) is indicated. Beyond reduction of triglyceride levels optimization of non-HDL-cholesterol by statin treatment is warranted to reduce vascular risk.

Cerebrovascular atherosclerosis in type III hyperlipidemia is modulated by variation in the apolipoprotein A5 gene.

OBJECTIVE: Type III Hyperlipoproteinemia is a rare lipid disorder with a frequency of 1-5 in 5000. It is characterized by the accumulation of triglyceride rich lipoproteins and patients are at increased risk of developping atherosclerosis. Type III HLP is strongly associated with the homozygous presence of the ε2 allele of the APOE gene. However only about 10% of subjects with APOE2/2 genotype develop hyperlipidemia and it is therefore assumed that further genetic and environmental factors are necessary for the expression of disease. It has recently been shown that variation in the APOA5 gene is one of these co-factors. The aim of this study is to investigate the development of cerebrovascular athero?sclerosis in patients with Type III hyperlipopro?teinemia (Type III HLP) and the role of variation in the APOA5 gene as a risk factor. METHODS: 60 patients with type III hyperlipidemia and ApoE2/2 genotype were included in the study after informed consent. The presence of cerebrovascular atherosclerosis was investigated using B-mode ultrasonography of the carotid artery. Serum lipid levels were measured by standard procedures.The APOE genotype and the 1131T>C and S19W SNPs in the APOA5 gene and the APOC3 sstI SNP were determined by restriction isotyping. Allele frequencies were determined by gene counting and compared using Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann Whitney test. A p value of 0.05 or below was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed using Statistica 7 software. RESULTS: The incidence of the APOA5 SNPs, -1131T>C and S19W and the APOC3 sstI SNP were determined as a potential risk modifier. After correction for conventional risk factors, the C allele of the -1131T>C SNP in the APOA5 gene was associated with an increased risk for the development of carotid plaque in patients with Type III HLP with an odds ratio of 3.69. Evaluation of the genotype distribution was compatible with an independent effect of APOA5. CONCLUSIONS: The development of atherosclerosis in patients with Type III HLP is modulated by variation in the APOA5 gene.

Impact of bezafibrate and atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclass in patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia: result from a crossover study.

BACKGROUND: We elucidated the difference between the effects of bezafibrate and atorvastatin in hypertriglyceridemia with apoE2/2 and 3/3. METHODS: An open randomized crossover study consisted of a 4-week treatment period with bezafibrate (400 mg daily) or atorvastatin (10 mg daily) and a 4-week wash-out period. RESULTS: Bezafibrate significantly decreased serum concentrations of triglyceride (apoE2/2, E3/3: -49.2%, -39.0%) and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (+28.5%, +26.1%) in both apoE phenotypes but did not change serum concentrations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Atorvastatin significantly decreased serum concentrations of LDL cholesterol (-34.0%, -30.0%) and triglyceride (-27.6%, -25.8%) in both apoE phenotypes but did not change HDL cholesterol concentrations. Changes in cholesterol in lipoprotein subfractions were not different between apoE2/2 and E3/3. Bezafibrate changed cholesterol distribution from small- to large-sized LDL and from large- to small-sized HDL. On the other hand, atorvastatin decreased cholesterol in all apoB-containing lipoprotein subfractions but did not change any of the HDL subfractions. CONCLUSION: Bezafibrate and atorvastatin improve atherogenic dyslipidemia in considerably different ways. Extrapolating from the present data, we presume that the combination of these drugs may contribute to reduce LDL-C/HDL-C ratio effectively as well as lowering concentrations of serum triglyceride.

Disappearance of angina pectoris by lipid-lowering in type III hyperlipoproteinemia.

Type III hyperlipoproteinemia is a rare familial disease characterized by marked elevations of serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels caused by an accumulation of remnant lipoproteins in apolipoprotein E2/E2 homozygotes. It is associated with an increased risk for premature atherosclerotic vascular disease. A 55-year-old woman was diagnosed as having type III hyperlipoproteinemia on the basis of skin lesions, serum lipid levels, lipid electrophoresis, and apolipoprotein E genotyping and stable angina pectoris on the basis of typical symptoms and treadmill exercise electrocardiographic results. After 1 year of combination therapy with atorvastatin and fenofibrate, skin xanthomata disappeared, leaving minimal remnants. In addition, there was no exertional chest pain, and treadmill exercise electrocardiographic results were negative. This finding was confirmed by coronary computed tomographic angiography. This case suggests that proper medical therapy can induce the regression of uncomplicated coronary lesions in type III hyperlipoproteinemia.